ASTM A387 class 2 and class 1: A Guide to Strength vs. Workability

When specifying materials for welded pressure vessels designed for elevated temperature service, the choice between different “Classes” within a standard can significantly impact both fabrication workflows and in-service performance. For engineers and procurement specialists, understanding the distinction between ASTM A387 class 2 and class 1 is crucial for optimizing design integrity against budget constraints. While they share the same chemical composition ranges within a given grade (such as Grade 11 or 22), the divergence in their mechanical properties, driven by heat treatment, defines their application.

The Fundamental Difference: Heat Treatment and Strength

At first glance, the numbering might suggest a hierarchical quality, but ASTM A387 class 2 and class 1 represent two different strength levels derived from specific thermal cycles. Class 1 is typically supplied in the annealed or normalized condition. This process yields a material that is generally softer and more ductile. In contrast, Class 2 achieves its higher tensile and yield strength through a quenching and tempering (Q&T) process. This fundamental difference in manufacturing is the primary driver for the price premium often associated with Class 2 materials, as the Q&T process requires precise control and additional energy input.

Mechanical Property Breakdown

To illustrate the performance gap, the table below outlines the typical tensile requirements for the most common grades (e.g., Grade 11) under both classes. These values dictate the allowable stress values used in pressure vessel design codes like ASME Section VIII, Division 1 [3].

Note: Specific values can vary slightly by grade (e.g., Gr. 22 has higher strength than Gr. 2). Always consult the latest ASTM standard.

Application Strategy: Where to Use ASTM A387 Class 2 And Class 1

The selection between ASTM A387 class 2 and class 1 is essentially a physics and economics equation.

1. When to Specify Class 1: For less critical applications where operational pressures and temperatures are moderate, Class 1 offers sufficient strength. Its lower yield strength can be advantageous in forming operations, as the material is more forgiving during cold rolling or pressing. It is often the go-to choice for lower-pressure heat exchangers and storage tanks where weldability and forming are prioritized over minimizing wall thickness.

2. When to Specify Class 2: If you are designing for high-pressure systems, every millimeter of reduced wall thickness translates to significant weight savings and lower welding consumable costs. Specifying ASTM A387 class 2 and class 1 in this context, Class 2 becomes the economic winner despite the higher base material cost. The higher strength allows for thinner walls, making the vessel lighter and easier to transport and install.

Chemical Composition Similarity

One of the most practical aspects of dealing with these two classes is that welders and procurement teams can treat them identically regarding filler metal selection. Because the chemistry is the same, the pre-heat and post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) procedures are generally similar, assuming comparable thicknesses. This consistency simplifies inventory management for steel plates and welding electrodes, a key consideration for global project logistics.

Conclusion

Selecting between ASTM A387 class 2 and class 1 ultimately depends on balancing design pressure requirements against fabrication flexibility. Class 1 remains a reliable, cost-effective choice for moderate service conditions where formability takes precedence. However, for high-pressure systems demanding reduced wall thickness and lighter structures, Class 2 delivers superior long-term value despite its higher initial cost. By understanding these mechanical trade-offs, engineers and procurement professionals can make informed decisions that optimize both performance and budget without compromising safety or code compliance.

like this article?Click here to see more:HNS NEWS